Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The federal court — indicating that respondent may have violated added requirements to report expenses in excess of $100, to limit hiring at his law firm and restrict support staff to two full-time staff members — referred the matter for prosecution by the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Baker v Dorfman, 2006 WL 988747 [SD NY 2006]). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 2:00 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Jan. 21, 2011); LeFaivre v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:20 pm
Today, some of the limitations on artist rights which courts have built into copyright law are discussed.Limitations and Their ApplicationDe Minimis UseIn Newton v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:01 am
The letter also stated “If you fail to contact [the Correction Department’s official] by May 5, 2008, your application may be discontinued. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
State of Haryana, (1993) 3 SCC 114, at page 120, this Court stated the importance of consistent opinions in achieving harmony in Judicial System:"10. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:11 am
In State of Punjab v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:23 am
In Wisniewski v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
INTA filed a brief in Nokia Corporation v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:09 am
Lozano, State Public Defender; Tina N. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:11 am
Appointment and removal of Special Police OfficersO'Donnell v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 3:07 am
Applying for reinstatement following a §73 termination from a §72 disability leaveMatter of Coleman v State of New York, Appellate Division, Third Department, 38 AD3d 1044Coleman was involved in an off-duty automobile accident and was placed on disability leave pursuant to §72 of the Civil Service Law. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 8:50 am
The January 19, 2011 Court of Appeals opinion Myers v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:35 pm
A readable example of sentence analysis.Healey v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:00 am
Ferrouillet v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:42 pm
By Mike Dorf In yesterday's SCOTUS opinion in NASA v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
There is no explicit exemption for political speech in either Title 17 of the United States Code (the statutory source of copyright in the United States) or in the Copyright Act in Canada. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 2:55 am
Holder Suisse S.A. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 8:05 pm
Haynes v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 6:20 am
From Cesspools to Septic Systems: An Overview of Massachusetts Title 5 (V) RulesThe Students Are Coming, The Students Are Coming! [read post]
