Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Heard"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 7,749
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2011, 5:31 am
In essence, he said, "[w]hat you've heard, though, is that industry can do a lot more, on a greater scale than the government ever can. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgment after a public hearing remains outstanding: El Diwany v Ministry of Justice & the Police, Norway, heard 16 March 2011 (Sharp J). [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
Yesterday’s infuriating opinion by SCOTUS in the Westboro Baptist Church case (Snyder v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 7:25 am
I have never heard of any of these people, or the poker businesses involved, before today. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:11 am
I have recently heard it said (again) -- by American legal academics -- that legal academics should aim at producing "transformative" scholarship. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:11 am
Ordinary people – those who aren’t IP professionals – often have a hard time telling patents from trademarks from copyright. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 6:06 am
This case is all about seats for airplanes If you are a patent-y person, you may have been following the fiercely contested litigation in Virgin Atlantic Airways Limited v v Premium Aircraft Interiors (UK) Limited (noted here by Matt the Kat). [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
Promissory estoppel: Barnes v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:50 pm
Gravel v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
I expect Student Loans to be the scourge of this Generation; I routinely talk to wonderful people who have gigantic student loans, and have no chance of getting them paid any time during this depression. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
The People) (Recording Industry vs The People) Viacom – YouTube should not be required to use software filters, Public Knowledge tells Court: Viacom v YouTube (Public Knowledge) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court N D Georgia: Trademark owner gets injunction against keyword ad campaign that generated no sales for the advertiser: InternetShopsInc.com v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:26 pm
We heard the same predictions in 1990 when we strengthened the Clean Air Act. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:45 am
Wolfe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 4:26 am
Florence’s case, the one heard in Philadelphia, said they had been presented with no evidence that the searches were needed, they nonetheless ruled that they would not second-guess corrections officials who said they feared that people like Mr. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 5:51 pm
The Consultation Paper explains that this is intended to ensure that the provision catches publications to a limited number of people (e.g. a blog with a small number of subscribers). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 4:09 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:19 am
Pass. clayton v clayton – does it still apply? [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:21 am
The argument was heard by a panel consisting of Judges Bryson, Lourie and Moore, and was attended by approximately 200 people. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 5:21 am
The argument was heard by a panel consisting of Judges Bryson, Lourie and Moore, and was attended by approximately 200 people. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:50 am
Back in State v. [read post]
