Search for: "United States v. Burden"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 8:12 am
The narrative frame for the article is the ACLU's lawsuit, Presley v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 9:10 pm
Who knows what goes through the minds of anyone, let alone a cloistered Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Moreover, the rule advocated by Venezuela and the United States wouldn’t actually “shield sovereigns from any burdens of litigation,” but instead would “simply frontload those burdens into the jurisdictional stage, including potentially broad discovery into the factual basis of the claim. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:23 am
`Stated differently, ‘[p]robation is not a right, but a privilege. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:17 pm
” In Groff v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 6:14 am
Defense counsel's objection appears to have been occasioned by an addendum to the probation order which Key was asked to sign, under which she would acknowledge and accept a waiver of her rights as to searches under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution (the Addendum). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 9:32 am
United States, 754 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 1:36 pm
See Mulraney v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:57 am
United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1099 v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
State Farm in 1983. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 3:41 pm
When the HHS Secretary has declared a public health emergency and the President of the United States has declared a disaster or emergency under the Stafford Act or National Emergencies Act, the HHS Secretary is authorized to grant certain waivers or modifications in order to address the outbreak (referred to as a Section 1135 Waiver). [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 8:36 am
In addition, however, the Court correctly analyzed whether Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 6:42 pm
Jude Medical, Cardiology Div., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 7:31 am
In AFFIRMING the motion court's denial of NYCM's petition for a stay of the SUM arbitration, the Third Department agreed with the lower court that NYCM had not met its heavy burden of showing "that it acted diligently in seeking to bring about [respondent's] co-operation; that the efforts employed by [petitioner] were reasonably calculated to obtain [respondent's] co-operation; and that the attitude of [respondent], after [her] co-operation was sought, was one of… [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
Section 9 provides that: The section applies to an action for defamation against a person who is not domiciled (a) in the United Kingdom; (b) in another Member State; or (c) in a state which is for the time being a contracting party to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:30 am
Koontz appealed to the United States Supreme Court, and the Court agreed to hear the case as a constitutional question. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 5:01 am
Corley (2d Cir. 2001); see also United States v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:34 am
Montana (Missoula).US v. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
