Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 5941 - 5960 of 16,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2007, 8:23 am
My friend Eric Muller has filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of Karen Korematsu-Haigh, Jay Hirabayashi, and Holly Yasui in the pending 2nd Circuit case of Turkmen v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:21 pm
I'm still hoping someone made a recording, but I did get this response from someone who attended (and who gave me permission to reprint this): On February 20, 2013, the Penn Federalist Society hosted Judge Edith Jones of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 2:42 pm by Craig Livermore
Camreta, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the interrogation of a juvenile by police authorities in the school setting in the absence of a warrant, court order, exigent circumstances, or parental consent, was an unconstitutional seizure under the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al., No. 18-189 (Three good questions): Whether Administrative Patent Judges of the [PTAB] are principal Officers of the United States who must be appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 8:22 pm by Larry
Bring balance to the law, the Honorable Circuit Judge Reyna did. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 10:15 pm by David Lat
Last week, the Court voted against rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 5:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
  Although decided by a three-judge panel, it had the distinctive style of its author, Circuit Judge Richard A. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:00 am by Aditi Shah
To reach its decision, the Ninth Circuit applied the framework in Boumediene v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 7:46 am by Lyle Denniston
United States may be moot, the D.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 10:50 am
The Supreme Court is expected to hear the case of Sprint/United Management Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am by Peter Vickery
Swarovski sued Building #19 and managed to obtain a preliminary injunction.Crystal figurine by... oh, wait.Yes, indeed: Swarovski persuaded a United States district court judge to prohibit Building #19 from using the word Swarovski in an ad that stated, truthfully, that the company was selling Swarovski crystal collectibles. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:24 am by Peter Vickery
Swarovski sued Building #19 and managed to obtain a preliminary injunction.Crystal figurine by... oh, wait.Yes, indeed: Swarovski persuaded a United States district court judge to prohibit Building #19 from using the word Swarovski in an ad that stated, truthfully, that the company was selling Swarovski crystal collectibles. [read post]