Search for: "United States v. Mannings"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 6,943
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2010, 10:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 2:39 pm
Congress over the past few decades to make it more and more difficult for an individual to be granted refugee status in the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 11:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 11:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 11:05 pm
v=D1R-jKKp3NAJ.K.Rowling:J.K.Rowling’s life is unbelievable. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm
------- Title: United States v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 10:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2009, 1:01 am
United States, 364 U.S. 40 (1960) While the consent of individual officials representing the United States cannot "estop" the United States, it can lead to the fruition of a number of expectancies embodied in the concept of "property" expectancies that, if sufficiently important, the Government must condemn and pay for before it takes over the management of the landowner's property. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
26 Dec 2009, 11:38 am
However valid one may find this argument to be, federalism and the United States Supreme Court allow for this incongruity today. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 10:04 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
The crossing, at the Upper Lars checkpoint in the Caucasus mountains, has been closed since 2006, when relations began growing tense, in part because of efforts by the Georgian president, Mikheil Saakashvili, to align himself more closely with the United States. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:55 am
' Is the principle of state sovereignty challenged not only by a single people, but also by international organizations? [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 2:19 pm
The first case to be tried under the new law was United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:00 am
Baroness Hale did note, however, in para. 94, If a Sikh man wears a turban or a Jewish man a yamoulka, we can readily assume that it was his free choice to adopt the dress dictated by the teachings of his religion. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:06 am
Ladele v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 6:17 am
’ Mazon, however, was not in the United States. . . [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 10:55 am
Around the same time, however, the United States Supreme Court decided Melendez-Diaz -v- Massachusetts. [read post]
