Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 10,394
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2014, 8:22 am
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as unsafe for <> BTLaw Alert: EPA Proposes Rulemaking: Revising the Regulatory Definition of "Waters of the United States" - The 370-page proposal should be published in the Federal Register soon, starting a 90-day comment period <> Supreme Court to Decide Whether CERCLA Statute Can Revive Otherwise Time-Barred Toxic Tort Suit - The Supreme Court will hear oral argument in CTS Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:15 am
The United States Supreme Court weighed the Right of Publicity against first amendment rights in the case of Zacchini v. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 7:04 am
Some of the international human rights law was written and ratified for use by states. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 7:34 am
Therefore they concluded it wasn’t necessary for them to address whether Bleiman was properly screened, and instead took Marks & Klein to task on not having written screening procedures in place. 'Because Marks & Klein was already representing the plaintiffs [Mody] when Bleiman joined the team, it is inexplicable that written [screening] procedures were not established at the outset.'" Fox Rothschild's White Collar Defense and Compliance blog… [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 2:39 pm
Kan. 1992), rev’d sub nom. on other grounds, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES February 2, 2011 Mr. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:13 am
Under the Marks rule established in Marks v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:54 pm
On its face, it does by specifying that the defendant must have “withheld from or misrepresented to the United States Food and Drug Administration. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
United States and Lee v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:34 am
This is true of both Oil States Energy Services. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 8:31 am
United States, and Bush v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 2:20 am
Paul Farley, D2008-0008 (WIPO February 2, 2008) (she “offers bondage, discipline and sado-masochism services … to customers in the San Francisco Bay and Washington D.C. areas of the United States”) is known by her stage name “Anna Dior”, hence she passes her legitimacy test for . [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 9:00 am
No problem…: Lundbeck A/S v Generics UK Ltd & Ors: (IPKat), Exelon (Rivastigmine Tartrate) – Dr Reddy’s and Novartis settle Exelon patent dispute: (Therapeutics Daily), GeneMaker – Codon Devices, Blue Heron Biotechnology settle patent suit over gene synthesis platform: (Patent Docs), Glucophage (Metformin) – Depomed settles patent litigation against IVAX: (SmartBrief), (IP Law360), (GenericsWeb), Lexapro… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 8:13 pm
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is the federal agency charged with overseeing livestock grazing on over 160 million acres of public land in the western United States. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 4:31 pm
United States President Trump’s personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, is discontinuing his defamation actions against Fusion GPS and Buzzfeed arising out of the infamous “Steele Dossier” Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has a number of posts including: An analysis of the approval of net neutrality laws in California and considers the practical legislative implications. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:32 am
Shortly after its passage, the Supreme Court held that the Amendment “is not a mere prohibition of State laws establishing or upholding slavery, but an absolute declaration that slavery or involuntary servitude shall not exist in any part of the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:00 pm
, (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (more from Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Washington State Patent Law Blog), (Harold Wegner), Global101 reasons for not selling your unused trade marks: (IPKat),ICANN to battle domain name tasting: (Trademark Blog), (related coverage from Trademark Blog),Is a patent a monopoly? [read post]
