Search for: "United States v. New York" Results 5941 - 5960 of 16,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Below is my column in the New York Post on the next step in the effort to disqualify former president Donald Trump in the 2024 election. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:31 am by Maseeh Moradi
Green Bay Co., 80 U.S. 166 (1872). [4] United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
LLC v Georges  2018 NY Slip Op 30989(U)  May 22, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 155636/2017  Judge: Robert D. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Richard A. Epstein
The current economic situation in the United States is recognized on all sides to be grim, and not getting better any time soon. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm by Josh Blackman
Akhil Amar's amicus brief, and a New York Times guest essay, tried to sell a Brandeisian 50-state solution for electing the President. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:44 am
  According to AT&T Mobility’s complaint filed in a New York federal court, Bursor’s stated goal is to coerce “AT&T to settle, given the ‘daunting’ prospect of fighting more than 750 arbitrations, anyone of which could stop the deal”, quoting Terry Baynes of Reuters. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:19 am by Emily Robertson
Last month, Judge Ronnie Abrams of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order that handed a big victory to Vugo and Rubric Legal. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 9:41 am by Eugene Volokh
While these organizations represent a variety of views across the ideological spectrum, they united with one voice in declaring that New York's statute is unlawful. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am by SHG
John Marshall, undoubtedly the greatest chief justice ever, spent his first month on the court as the secretary of state of the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2013, 10:41 pm by Jeff Gamso
Some Poor Fuckup or United States of America v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:44 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
According to a summary of the oral argument by the New York Times, the justices seemed to have “little enthusiasm” for allowing such a broad exception to the requirement of a warrant. [read post]