Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 5941 - 5960
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2011, 8:33 am
But we’re not done! [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 6:04 pm
"Most officers don't involve themselves in this type of conduct. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
The property system doesn't work if you don't have clear boundaries. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
The Citigroup Case: Judge Rakoff's Decision and the Potential Impact on How SEC Cases Proceed. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am
If you don’t need incentives, then don’t use them—write open source. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:01 am
“Ordinary people don’t dare fight with the developers. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 12:17 am
In the US we don't have anything like the "proportionate and permissible" intrusion principle, which apparently provides a loophole when someone successfully invokes the privilege against self-incrimination. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
California's system requires a judge to sentence the defendant to the middle of three sentencing terms (e.g., 6, 12, or 16 years), unless the judge finds—by the preponderance of the evidence—an aggravating fact that would support the longer term. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:26 am
"We don't think anybody is arguing that. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:24 am
But Anderson's failings don't excuse Bradley's own decisions to fight disclosure of exculpatory evidence and DNA testing that eventually exonerated Mr. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
The court threw them out because fairness required that a defendant be judged by the standards of the country where the drug in question was approved:[F]airness to the defendant mandates that defendant’s conduct be judged by the standards of the community affected by its actions. . . . [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 5:36 pm
"But if damages are about deterrence, then that says you don't get off the hook just because you were lucky enough to hit someone who had a short life expectancy. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:28 pm
That way, if Congress doesn't like the change, it can pass legislation canceling it. [read post]
28 May 2010, 4:23 am
They don’t deserve to be cut off at the knees by the court, and in the process set a miserable precedent for future cases. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 6:59 am
But he supports his arguments with some whoppers and fallacious arguments that don't hold water.Whopper #1, Epstein writes: "American courts commonly think it proper for juries to infer medical negligence from the mere occurrence of a serious injury. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 10:41 am
Judge David F. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 8:38 am
" I don't believe the piece sold that day, but the auction was authentic. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
Many of those cases seek reams of records, requiring massive efforts from defendant agencies. . . . [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
I'm skeptical about claims of parents' constitutional right to opt out from parts of public school curricula (and about K-12 teachers' claims of a constitutional right to include in their teaching things that the school doesn't want them to include); I think all those decisions should generally be left to the political process. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:53 pm
So if you are in a federal district other than Colorado, you don't have to worry the motion described below is the product of a coordinated effort by DOJ in Washington to prevent defendants from raising compliance with state law or the Holder/Ogden memos as a defense to federal prosecution. [read post]
