Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 5961 - 5980 of 11,017
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2013, 6:20 am by Kelly Ann Bird
United Parcel Service, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that UPS did not have to afford a pregnant employee an accommodation relative to an essential job function. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:56 pm by Andrew F. Sellars
Orin Kerr states in part two of his comprehensive analysis of Swartz's case that Aaron's Law would not have changed the outcome. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm by Bexis
  The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued its ruling in Young v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 7:45 am by assoulineberlowe
On January 10, 2013, the Supreme Court of Florida issued a 34 page opinion in Diamond Aircraft Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:58 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:01 am by Gene Quinn
” A Federal Circuit decision dealing with that limitation (Santarus, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:48 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States Court of Federal Claims. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 9:04 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Judge Laura Taylor Swain this week in John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by Rachel Sachs
At Buzzfeed, Chris Geidner profiles Edith Windsor, the plaintiff in this Term’s United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Regardless, however, the Regulations state that for purposes of calculating these numbers, retirees and beneficiaries continuing coverage under the group medical coverage continuation rules generally count. [read post]