Search for: "B&B LLC" Results 5961 - 5980 of 12,238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2016, 6:02 am by SHG
Copyright © 2007-2016 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
13 May 2016, 6:00 am
[Answer in first comment.]In re Comfortband, LLC, Serial No. 86174491 (May 11, 2016) [not precedential]. [read post]
11 May 2016, 7:31 am by Patti Waller
United Natural Trading LLC, d/b/a Woodstock Farms Manufacturing, Edison, NJ, is voluntarily recalling a limited number of lots of conventional walnuts and walnut-containing products (see attachment for products and lot numbers) that were purchased from Gibson Farms and sold under the Nature’s Promise, Woodstock, Market Basket, and Woodfield Farms brands due to a possible health risk from Listeria monocytogenes. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Belmora LLC yesterday filed a petition for reconsideration en banc [pdf here] of the FLANAX decision issued by the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2016, 9:12 am by MBettman
Pal, Obral, Silk & Associates, LLC, Cleveland, for Appellee Darlene Burnham Cleveland Clinic’s Argument The court needs to clarify and restore 20 years of precedent with regard to privileged material under R.C. 2505.02(B)(4). [read post]
9 May 2016, 7:48 am by Steven Koprince
GAO’s decision in Latvian Connection, LLC, B-412701 (Apr. 22, 2016) involved an Air Force solicitation for the acquisition of fitness equipment for gyms at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio. [read post]
4 May 2016, 12:31 pm by Steven Koprince
The SBA Area Office determined that Wiss was a joint venture between Dae Sung, LLC, an 8(a) Program participant, and LB&B Associates, Inc., a non-8(a) firm. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
Klinowski with Wallace, Jordan, Ratliff, & Brandt LLC. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Stephen O’Donnell Cyber liability insurance is a relatively new product and many of the terms and conditions found in cyber-liability policies are as yet untested in the courts. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:20 pm by David M. McLain
  Some insurers have pushed back on this rule arguing that it may cause an insurer to exercise its duty to defend although the underlying facts ultimately do not fall within the policy.In KF 103-CV, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:20 pm by David M. McLain
  Some insurers have pushed back on this rule arguing that it may cause an insurer to exercise its duty to defend although the underlying facts ultimately do not fall within the policy.In KF 103-CV, LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 3:15 am
The Board noted that the opposed application was filed under Section 1(b) and applicant never filed an amendment to allege use or a statement of use. [read post]