Search for: "DOES 1-8"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 32,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2013, 6:11 pm
It does not ban unsolicited commercial email outright. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 6:52 am
In particular, a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) EUTMR could be established if the goods in question were regarded as identical. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:15 pm
Note that Reese’s Law also provides labeling requirements for the packaging of button cell and coin batteries themselves, which the UL 4200A-23 standard does not address. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 7:11 am
Philip Havers QC of 1 Crown Office represented Martin in this case. [read post]
5 May 2019, 10:39 am
The questions posed are whether the White Paper demonstrates sufficient certainty and precision in respect of each of the following matters.1. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
Does, 2013 WL 1907059. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
Does, 2013 WL 1907059. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
First of all, as regards the invention defined in the present claims, the description explains in detail the different aspects of the steps of the invention […] and also illustrates with reference to Figures 5 to 8 an example of implementation of the claimed invention; the description therefore does provide a sufficiently detailed description of at least one way of carrying out the presently claimed invention, using examples and referring to the drawings as stipulated by R… [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Patry, Copyright §3:151, p. 3-485 (2016)). [8] Id. at 8. [9] Id. at 5. [10] Id. at 7. [11] Id. [12] Id. at 10. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Patry, Copyright §3:151, p. 3-485 (2016)). [8] Id. at 8. [9] Id. at 5. [10] Id. at 7. [11] Id. [12] Id. at 10. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 2:08 pm
[8] Id [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:26 pm
The law is clear that affidavits are not admissible at trial.[1] Defendant accordingly objects to all portions of Alphabet's affidavit that purport to adduce facts about the case. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
Id. at *8-9. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
Figure 8). [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am
Circuit case which found that visa sponsors in the United States had standing to assert that the State Department’s refusal to process visa applications of Vietnamese citizens living in Hong Kong violated 8 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:55 pm
See id., at 348 n.8.) [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:43 pm
§ 227(a)(1). [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 1:43 pm
§ 227(a)(1). [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
A (ECF No. 1-1) at 3).) [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:54 am
The County opposed the petitions on the grounds that 1) SMARA does not apply; 2) if SMARA applies, the Ordinance Opponents have failed to show prejudice from the failure to comply; and 3) the ordinance is exempt from CEQA. [read post]
