Search for: "Does, 1-20" Results 5961 - 5980 of 27,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
As we recently reported, on August 1, 2024, the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Ryan LLC v. [read post]
As we recently reported, on August 1, 2024, the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Ryan LLC v. [read post]
As we recently reported, on August 1, 2024, the Northern District of Texas issued a preliminary injunction in Ryan LLC v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
Consequently, claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 does not fulfil the requirements of A 84. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The EBA had held that Article 53(b) EPC does not exclude plants from patentability, even if they are obtained through an essentially biological process. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:44 pm by Jon Bowers
  The system does not offer you any leniency because you are accountable. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:21 am by Broc Romanek
” It’s free for members of TheCorporateCounsel.net (but it does cost $20 in shipping & handling). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:45 am
As a result, the association reported in 2008, batted ball injuries to pitchers declined from 145 a year to about 20 to 30 a year since the agreement. (1) Part of the popularity of metal bats is that they are less likely to break than their wooden counterparts and, therefore, are more cost-efficient. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 10:37 pm
This is slightly odd, because the Kat has in his possession a series of five extremely interesting decisions of the Board, all of which are dated 20 June 2008.Right: Fifa's excellent figurative Community trade mark, which -- unlike the word marks listed below -- was not under threat in these proceedingsThe decisions are not joined, though they are clearly similar: they are Cases R 1466/2005-1, R 1467/2005-1, R 1468/2005-1, R 1469/2005-1 and R… [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 2:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
Legassie, Andrew Legassie (then in his early 20s) had sent, to five girls aged 14 to 17, “explicit digital images” of himself exposing his genitals. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 7:08 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 1 Complaint 6-1 US Motion for Summary J 11 Two Shields Opposition 12 Two Shields Motion for Discovery 14 US Reply in Support of Motion for Summary J 15 US Opposition to Motion for Discovery 16 Two Shields Reply in Support of Motion for Discovery 17 US Request for Judicial Notice 17-1 Cobell Fairness Hearing Transcript 18 Two Shields Response to Request for Judicial Notice 19 US Reply in Support of Request for Judicial Notice 20-1 Two Shields Surreply… [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
In its communication dated 20 May 2009 the Board noted that due to the above-mentioned situation the notice of appeal appeared to contain an inconsistency concerning the name/identity of the appellant (R 101(2) and R 99(1)(a)), which has to be a registered party to the opposition proceedings (A 107) and a legal entity still existing at the filing date of the notice of appeal (T 525/94). [read post]