Search for: "FRIDAY v. STATE" Results 5961 - 5980 of 7,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 7:49 am
Particularly, what does the opinion mean for acquired distinctiveness in the EU, in view of the The General Court and the Advocate General’s favoured approach, whereby sufficient evidence of acquired distinctiveness through use is required for every Member State. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:56 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Dominic Ponsford in the Press Gazette said that IMPRESS differs little from IPSO but that “the state should not force publishers into it. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The event will take place online Friday, 25 February 2022 from 10:00AM – 11:00 AM ET. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
On Thursday night last week, after the Supreme Court issued its order in Noem v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 8:29 pm by TDot
 I’m also assuming, simply because they claimed it in the complaint they filed (h/t to Above the Law for this entry on the lawsuit), that the named plaintiffs in McDonald v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:57 pm by Ilya Somin
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Friday, in Missouri v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:08 am by Susan Brenner
Tatro appealed that decision to the state Court of Appeals. [read post]
22 Feb 2025, 8:44 pm by Josh Blackman
On Friday evening (after I signed off), the Supreme Court issued a terse statement in Bessent v. [read post]