Search for: "Federal, Inc." Results 5961 - 5980 of 57,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2023, 9:52 am by Geoff Schweller
On December 18, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania announced a $14.7 million False Claims Act (FCA) settlement with BioTelemetry, Inc. and its subsidiary, LifeWatch Services, Inc over allegations that the companies billed federal healthcare programs for more expensive services than physicians intended to order. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 6:19 pm
A recent Federal Circuit case highlights the contrast between claims of patent infringement and violation of the Lanham Act.In Baden Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2008, 3:50 pm
The opinion will be of interest to anyone faced with the issue of attorney's fees both in federal court under diversity jurisdiction and in state court. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 5:59 pm by Coral Beach
Federal officials in the U.S. say a California company will be recalling red onions because a Salmonella Newport outbreak has been traced to them, but as of Friday night that recall was not posted. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
The requirements for establishing a group action are the same as the pre-Dukes requirements for maintaining a class action under Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure—namely, clarifying that the merits of the case need not be proven to certify the group action. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 11:04 am by Michael Dery
On December 12, 2011, Chief Justice Blais of the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada (“FCA”) granted a suspension (a “stay”) of a rare structural injunctive order, pending an appeal commenced by Air Canada (click here for decision). [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 1:17 pm by WIMS
If Congress has addressed a federal issue by statute, then there is no gap for federal common law to fill. . . 'The test for whether congressional legislation excludes the declaration of federal common law is simply whether the statute speak[s] directly to [the] question at issue.'  [citing: American Electric Power Co., Inc. v. [read post]