Search for: "High v State"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 35,518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 12:48 pm
. - The United States Supreme Court has issued its opinion in Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 5:20 am
And last week, in Connick v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 2:43 pm
Luther v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
But there are also many consumers who benefit from the "freemium" approach because they get to play lots of high-quality games for free before they decide where to spend any money. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 7:10 am
Souter delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 10:02 am
See Center for Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm
The Second Circuit today revived Starbucks' Federal Trademark Dilution Act (FTDA) claim against the mark CHARBUCKS, but affirmed a judgment, entered after a bench trial, dismissing Starbucks' federal infringement and New York state dilution claims.In Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:34 am
The case, Florida v. [read post]
30 May 2013, 4:44 am
In the Michigan case of People v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:20 am
“This Court cannot countenance a claim by the Governor and Legislature of a State that there is no duty on state officials to obey federal court orders resting on this Court's considered interpretation of the United States Constitution in Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 7:32 pm
Madison was wrongly decided (or in some classes, that Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 5:25 pm
V. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 12:50 pm
In Allianz Insurance Co Egypt v Aigaion Insurance Co SA [2008] EWHC 1127 (Comm), the English High Court was asked to examine the effect of the term "Deffered [sic] Premium Clause" in the reinsurance slip and to ascertain whether its inclusion was so uncertain as to be of no contractual effect and to make the whole contract ineffective.Allianz alleged that Aigaion had agreed to reinsure 30 percent of the cover provided by Allianz in respect of a fleet of tugs. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 8:21 am
See Gamble v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:29 am
Johnson County CC Sending Politically Charged Emails Does Not Support Disturbing the Peace Conviction — State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:05 am
Law Lessons from MARY MASCUILLO V. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:20 pm
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 1:43 pm
A tentative date of June 2017 has been set for the start of the jury trial in a South Dakota state court over the “pink slime” dispute known as BPI v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:27 pm
Supreme Court's decision (Cert denied 06-1410 Idaho -v- Estrada) to let the Estrada ruling stand could have widespread ramifications for Idaho, said state Deputy Attorney General Ken Jorgensen. [read post]
