Search for: "In Re" R" Children"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 12,012
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
In Re Estate of Parker, 2008-CA-00693-COA (July21,2009). [1] Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:05 pm
By contrast, the Chinese believe that the best way to protect their children is by preparing them for the future, letting them see what they’re capable of, and arming them with skills, work habits and inner confidence that no one can ever take away.This actually seems quite reasonable. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:31 am
In re NIR, 797 F. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) OHIM Board of Appeal rules on functional designs: R 690/2007-3 (Class 99) X5 and CEO Are they still riding side by side – Munich District Court and Turin District Court draw deviating conclusions in design dispute (Class 99) USPTO’s transparency puts Europe to shame (IAM) EU community patent and UPLS: Will there be a political breakthrough soon? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:07 am
To the extent that there is a theory at work here, it appears to be that men and women who have committed sex crimes will re-offend if permitted to spend their nights within 2,000 feet of public places where children gather during the day. [read post]
18 May 2008, 11:44 am
"Here we're trying to protect the public, and it's going to cost us more. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:15 am
However, SSI benefits can’t be garnished since they’re not considered part of a parent’s income. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 12:49 pm
Lose any track of your children at any moment. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:02 am
Our main concern is just the safety of the children. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 11:46 pm
"No, you're not. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:33 am
It isn’t their fault the one they’re with doesn’t respect their boundaries and personal decisions. 14.) [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
In our view, the trial judge’s reasons are sufficient in law (see R. v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 7:33 am
We're also interested in what our readers have to say, so we hope you jump in on the comments! [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 12:21 pm
Signage clearly warns drivers to travel slowly as children are playing in the residential neighborhood. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:00 am
There was no response to the r 10.3 letter, and the writer did not elected to become a party opponent. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 12:39 pm
But it’s possible that some patients (especially in rural areas, a point the panel opinion makes) might find that there are few doctors around, especially if they’re looking for specialists. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 6:30 am
Another of our mid-level candidates with two children was recently offered US$105,000 (at a firm that figures out expat / cola on case by case, with associates with no children typically receiving around US$75,000 for their allowance). [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:23 am
Maybe the Texas Supreme Court is reading this opinion right now and thinking about deciding the Texas state case In re J.B. out of the Dallas court on the validity of same-sex marriages and the right of Texas to grant a same-sex divorce. [read post]
15 Sep 2007, 3:28 pm
If you're surprised to find that a very high percentage of men who look at child pornography also molest children, ask yourself if you think you're more or less likely to blow your diet if you stare at photos of your favorite food.For the "experts" who promote the brain-dead theory that looking at child porn prevents molestation, here' a legal term for your theory: Crockus Humungus. ..more.. by Jan LaRue, Esq. , Culture and Media InstituteSex… [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
If you're surprised to find that a very high percentage of men who look at child pornography also molest children, ask yourself if you think you're more or less likely to blow your diet if you stare at photos of your favorite food.For the "experts" who promote the brain-dead theory that looking at child porn prevents molestation, here' a legal term for your theory: Crockus Humungus. ..more.. [read post]