Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 6,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
While New York does allow for some exceptions to the time limitations rule, they are not applicable in this type of matter. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:49 am
DavisBouie and Jones filed a 42 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:43 am
Jones referred him to his internist. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 9:21 am
Jones as involving statutory interpretation rather than a statement of constitutional doctrine and United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:38 am
For those interested in such matters - see the Legal Week story in full - this quote gives the flavour: “As numerous law firm elections have shown, there's always something to be said for being an unknown quantity. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:22 am
Dept. of Child Services (NFP) Carl Jones v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 5:12 am
Sorrell, which is of significance to admiralty practitioners because a seaman's statutory remedy for personal injury due to negligence - the Jones Act - expressly incorporates the liability standards applicable to railroad accidents.
Law Firm Partnership LawFriday, January 26, 2007By Arthur J. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 2:38 pm
Additionally, this relationship became publicized in a lengthy article in the Baton Rouge Advocate which articulated the fact that Jones had been sentenced by Judge Harris for the felony he committed. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 8:00 am
" Mervyn Griffith-Jones, prosecuting counsel, R v. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 4:42 am
The force used in this case was clearly less than that determined to be de minimis in Durruthy, Vinyard, Nolin and Jones. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
The "it," of course, is negligence per se based upon claims that the defendant somehow violated the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act ("FDCA").Pull up a cyberchair and pay attention because we're going to explain some ways of defeating such claims - as a matter of law - that you probably haven't considered.First, a little bit on why FDCA-based negligence per se is so dangerous and difficult a cause of action to deal with. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The emphasis on Jones and constitutional avoidance is very helpful because most of the Jones analysis focuses on the Fifth Amendment and Winship, whereas Booker is strictly a Sixth Amendment case. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:05 pm
Jones, that the U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:37 am
Jones of Wheatland, Wyoming.Representing Appellee (Plaintiff): Jerry M. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
" In Cletus Jones v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 8:24 am
(2) Justice Jones didn't have a superstar resume. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:35 am
Listen in to "Stupid People" and you may realize just how stupid you are to believe in corporate America, or for that matter, a fair shake at attaining the American dream. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 12:58 pm
Everyone always assumes that everyone likes potatoes as a matter of course.5. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 5:17 am
Opperman Professor of Law at New York University School of Law and of counsel to Jones Day, and Steven C. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 3:22 pm
Castanias of Jones Day will argue on behalf of petitioner Sinochem. [read post]
