Search for: "In re Means" Results 5961 - 5980 of 89,434
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
But as long as we’re enjoying this, wouldn’t a colon simply be two hamburger patties? [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Bexis
  We're not securities lawyers, so we're primarily concerned with how Matrixx could affect product liability litigation.We don't think it will have all that much, since the court makes pretty sure that "materiality" for securities litigation does not mean proof of medical causation that would stand up in a court of law. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 2:34 pm by Anthony A. Fatemi, LLC
The spouse seeking to enforce a verbal MSA must prove exactly what each spouse has agreed to – i.e., what you’re getting, what you’re giving up, what they’re getting, and what they’re giving up. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:50 pm
  Should this proposal become law, that means employers will just have to suck it up and pay the additional penalties, give notice way before they’re ready to (and maybe the notice  proves to be  unnecessary causing unnecessary angst), or get a new crystal ball. [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 5:30 am by Donna
What this means is that you agree you can be terminated for any reason or no reason at all. [read post]
18 May 2009, 12:00 am
" In re Shearer, Serial No. 78690531 (May 14, 2009) [not precedential].Applicant argued that the word "pussy" has multiple meanings, that nothing in the mark or in the packaging for the product suggests a vulgar meaning, and that the PTO did not establish how the mark would be perceived as scandalous in the marketplace.The Board, however, found that the PTO's evidence confirmed that "the attention-grabbing meaning is the only reasonable… [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 1:50 pm by AdamSmith1776
Beware articulating a "BHAG" that only has meaning to the executive suite. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 12:18 pm by Bexis
We’re the Drug and Device Law Blog here, but when we look at court opinions, sometimes we can’t tell if they’re in our bailiwick or not, until we read them. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:01 am by SHG
They’re not kidding when they say they’re “recorded. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 1:34 am
They need to be a little mouthy to work, but that's going to mean that they're a risk. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:18 pm
They see statements like this by the Associated Press, and assume that they’re accurate. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 10:50 am
  I'm just saying they're not on my list. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:29 am
As I wrote over a year ago when the divisive 2016 campaign was still heating up, the time for a strong alliance between these two communities has long since past.I don't mean to say there aren't efforts to do so. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:53 am by David Feldman
This means that you would have to season through all of 2013 and until you file the Form 10-K for that year in March of 2014! [read post]