Search for: "J. Eddings"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 6,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2009, 12:31 am
Reserve: KF240.J32 2002 Legal research illustrated: an abridgment of Fundamentals of legal research, 8th ed, by J. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:45 pm
There are very serious cases declining to award attorneys fees, so a non-victorious party ought to marshal every factor possible to persuade a court to exercise its wide discretion in that party's favor.Renoir Self-Portrait above.Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 7:02 pm
Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 6:43 am
Justice Nardelli's dissent is compelling and appears to be a correct statement of the law.Related articles by ZemantaAnother Court Deals Major Blow to DVD Copying (wired.com) Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 1:57 pm
Cooke ed. 1961). [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 11:19 am
Meanwhile it is true, in my view, that the body of evidence they point to is consistent with competitive conditions) and offer evidence from two other studies (Javier Gil-Bazo & Pablo Ruiz- Verdu, When Cheaper is Better: Fee Determination in the Market for Equity Mutual Funds, 67 J. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:42 pm
Related articles by Zemanta With fair-use defense rejected, RIAA music piracy trial could end with big fine (macworld.com) Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 4:02 pm
" Law professor J. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 7:52 am
See Edward J. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:00 pm
Los tribunales argentinos han resuelto en el transcurso del año 2008 un número interesante de casos vinculados con procesos de insolvencia transfronteriza. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:14 pm
To borrow an example from Professor Fleming (The Law of Torts (8th ed. 1992) at p. 193), a "fire ignited in a wastepaper basket is … caused not only by the dropping of a lighted match, but also by the presence of combustible material and oxygen, a failure of the cleaner to empty the basket and so forth". [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:50 pm
Surowiecki, J. (2004). [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 12:26 pm
The Democratic Primary is September 15.Last week, the Liz Benjamin of the Daily News reported here a scandal involving a charity on New York's Lower East Side involving the incumbent City Councilman using the charity's employees to collect signatures.Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 8:28 am
Dowd, Dunnington Bartholow & Miller LLPAll Programs include: (1) Affirmation, (1) DVD/CD packet and (1) set of Written Materials TITLE AVAILABLE IN DVD FORMAT ONLY.Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
(Patent Librarian's Notebook) US Patent Reform Article: ‘Interlocutory Appeals of Claim Construction in the Patent Reform Act of 2009’ by Ed Reines and Nathan Greenblatt (Patently-O) (Gray on Claims) US Patents Taxation of patent sales (IP Frontline) USPTO Office of PCT legal administration mailing list (Patent Docs) Summary of local patent rules affecting claim construction practice (Part 1 of 5) (Gray on Claims) Lawyer and neutral David… [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 9:05 am
Related articles by Zemanta Taylor Lautner - 2009 Teen Choice Awards (socialitelife.celebuzz.com) Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 11:30 am
Copyright Litigation Handbook (West 4th Ed. 2009) by Raymond J. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Citing to numerous district court and appellate court opinions, as well as to the Federal Judicial Center Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (2d ed. 2000), the Court recognized that the “no safe level” theory is: (1) a hypothesis that cannot be tested, verified, or falsified, (2) has been rejected by a majority of the scientific community, and (3) has no known potential rate of error. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Citing to numerous district court and appellate court opinions, as well as to the Federal Judicial Center Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (2d ed. 2000), the Court recognized that the “no safe level” theory is: (1) a hypothesis that cannot be tested, verified, or falsified, (2) has been rejected by a majority of the scientific community, and (3) has no known potential rate of error. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
Citing to numerous district court and appellate court opinions, as well as to the Federal Judicial Center Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (2d ed. 2000), the Court recognized that the “no safe level” theory is: (1) a hypothesis that cannot be tested, verified, or falsified, (2) has been rejected by a majority of the scientific community, and (3) has no known potential rate of error. [read post]
