Search for: "Line v. People"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 13,526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In the wonderful case of Sopo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
In the wonderful case of Sopo v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 4:01 am
On one level, the Supreme Court’s ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:25 pm
In United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
Alito is up next with the opinion in Birchfield v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm
And he did include perfunctory lines about the need for “strict scrutiny” of racial preferences. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:14 pm
” Last term, in Texas Department of Housing v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:53 am
It’s hard to view today’s ruling in the second Fisher v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 5:27 am
Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
In 2014, a blaze broke out in a two-story rental unit, killing six people. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 2:26 pm
In 2014, a blaze broke out in a two-story rental unit, killing six people. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Louisiana that Miller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 12:18 pm
BNC Bancorp v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 3:56 am
Orin refers to Brown v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
It is more like a football field covered in snow, where only after the play is over do they brush off the snow to see if your footprint was inside or outside the line, and even then the line has been blurred enough that reasonable people can disagree on where its edge is.The attenuation doctrine was developed to mitigate the harshness of the rule excluding "derivative" evidence. [read post]
18 Jun 2016, 5:37 am
When Andrew Fleischman finished writing his Fault Lines post about the Texas Supreme Court’s decision in Texas v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:00 pm
The question in this case is whether this rule applies only to first assistants under the default rule, or whether it also applies to the alternative people the president can designate. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
The case of Padwick Properties ltd v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:25 am
The bottom line is that there is now a third case, which challenges the refusal to issue carry permits. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Trump is the one who has a bias here—it’s his money and reputation on the line, after all—and the Judge simply has a view of the governing law or facts that is different from that presented by Trump’s lawyers. [read post]
