Search for: "Louisiana Supreme Court"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 6,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2012, 7:07 am
In making this argument, the prosecution relied on the “workplace exception” established in the Supreme Court’s decision in O’Connor v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
The Arkansas Supreme Court enforced that rule in Kraemer v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
Id. at 790-91.Similarly, California Supreme Court applied a “reasonableness” standard to the computation of out-of pocket damages, concluding that the face-value of medical bills – never actually paid – are not ipso facto“reasonable. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
District Court in Roanoke. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 3:23 am
The even bigger problem is that Congress has treated insurance as a sacred cow since 1945, when the federal government overruled the Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Now, the group that filed the complaint against Thornton, the Campaign Legal Center, is considering pursuing the matter in federal court. [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 9:26 am
Supreme Court, and similar laws in Arkansas, Kentucky, and Alabama. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
Philip Morris is again in the Supreme Court, not testing the limits of punitive damages, but as Tony Sebok relates at FindLaw, about its claim the case should be in federal court instead of state. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:40 am
Groupon * Georgia Supreme Court Blesses Google’s Keyword Ad Sales–Edible IP v. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 7:32 am
Groupon * Georgia Supreme Court Blesses Google’s Keyword Ad Sales–Edible IP v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
The Supreme Court said as much when two important cases are read together: the 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:24 am
The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld that principle under the United States Constitution....... [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
The Florida Supreme Court in MacMurdo cited the following precedent as supporting the expert testimony requirement: Wyeth Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
Provincial Government of MarinduqueDocket: 09-944Issue(s): Whether federal courts have jurisdiction to rule on a case that involves potential foreign policy issues because a foreign government is involved.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioners' supplemental briefPetitioners' reply Title: Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen – Self Insurers Fund v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:36 am
It occurred right in the middle of the class action retrenchment required by the Supreme Court’s decisions in Ortiz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:44 pm
In this way, the United States Supreme Court ‘set the standard that a punishment would be cruel and unusual, [if] it was too severe for the crime, [if] it was arbitrary, if it offended society’s sense of justice, or if it was not more effective than a less severe penalty. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm
Louisiana). [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 12:12 pm
In talking about the role of the federal prosecutor or the United States Attorney, Supreme Court Justice Sutherland wrote: “The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
