Search for: "MATTER OF B T B" Results 5961 - 5980 of 19,798
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
  If, in fact, the reason for deleting the footnote was because the appellant did indeed argue the thing that the Court of Appeal (originally) said it didn't, and hence, that the Court of Appeal didn't address.Now, the Court of Appeal not only doesn't have to satisfy my curiosity -- or anyone else's, for that matter -- but is also fairly busy. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:05 am by David Post
Until I know what you - the speaker - mean by them, I don't know what the sentence means. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 8:05 am by David Post
Until I know what you - the speaker - mean by them, I don't know what the sentence means. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:22 pm by John Elwood
Such suits are called “qui tam” actions, Latin for “I don’t know what I’m saying. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 9:45 am by Michael Risch
b) how many applications are in the troubled classes (and others)? [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 1:12 pm
(…) Because this case does not involve Article III standing, but rather presents an issue of statutory standing, subject matter jurisdiction is not implicated, and the parties incorrectly relied on Rule 12(b)(1). [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 9:20 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Section 1818(b)(1) but would not include a generic or conclusory reference to “safety and soundness. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
Kal Raustiala and Christopher Sprigman are well known as the authors of the book, The Knock-Off Economy: How Imitation Sparks Innovation (2012). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:59 am by Robichaud
(scalability)” With a proper perspective, your model should be transferable to any area of law, or any service for that matter. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:59 am by Robichaud
(scalability)” With a proper perspective, your model should be transferable to any area of law, or any service for that matter. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 8:06 am by Jacobs Paul
As the United States Supreme Court explained in a somewhatanalogous context in Alamo Foundation, supra, 471 U.S. at page 302, with respectto the federal wage and hour law: “[T]he purposes of the [FLSA] require that it beapplied even to those who would decline its protections. [read post]