Search for: "MATTER OF RULES OF EVIDENCE"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 42,210
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2022, 5:08 pm
The Court made clear that it was not holding invalid the traditional rule of completeness as applied to testimonial statements that would otherwise be admissible under the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 2:02 pm
Langley issued a 50-page ruling rejecting Reed’s bid for a new trial. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
To post an open Indian law or leadership job to Turtle Talk, send the following information to indigenous@law.msu.edu: In the email body: A typed brief description of the position which includes: Position title Location (city, state) Main duties Closing date Any other pertinent details such as links to the application An attached PDF job announcement. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I’m not going to set it all out here but the core part (from section 1) is this : (3) Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following— (a) physical or sexual abuse; (b) violent or threatening behaviour; (c) controlling or coercive behaviour; (d) economic abuse (see subsection (4)); (e) psychological, emotional or other abuse; and it does not matter whether the behaviour consists of a single incident or a course of conduct. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
ExxonMobil is asking the Texas Supreme Court to allow it to use the law, known as rule 202, to pursue legal action against more than a dozen California municipal officials. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 1:16 pm
"[T]here are [also] many other less restrictive rules that could be adopted to minimize the risk" of allowing gun shops, ammunition shops, and firing ranges to remain open. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
But grace ruled the day at the 1788 Massachusetts convention. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:10 am
It violates a person’s civil rights to murder them, unless qualified immunity kicks in, but that’s a different matter inapplicable here. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The court further observed that plain error review is not available for discretionary decisions of the trial court, and the case “did not remotely approach” the circumstances where invocation of Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure was warranted to obtain review. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 2:40 pm
" … In his response, Wood denied generally that he had violated "any of the Delaware Professional Conduct Rules or conduct rules in any other jurisdiction in connection with his involvement in the matters cited by the Court. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 12:41 pm
Pursuant to Rule 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "[t]he title of the complaint must name all the parties[.] [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
The court allowed Schenker's First Amendment claim against the University to go forward: Supreme Court precedent in the realm of academia could not be clearer: The essentiality of freedom in the community of American universities is almost self-evident. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 8:51 am
At a more granular level, matters got even worse. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:00 am
Parties in a divorce matter are afforded a meaningful trial and that, too, makes perfect sense. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 3:29 pm
There Is No Evidence that Self-Preferencing Is Generally Harmful Self-preferencing is a normal part of how platforms operate, both to improve the value of their core products and to earn returns so that they have reason to continue investing in their development. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
" Here, the disclosure rule only applies in the last ten days of an election. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 1:09 pm
And it doesn’t matter, he says, for purposes of whether he has a right to sue, whether his injury is “self-inflicted”: A ruling to the contrary, Cruz suggests, “would cause a sea change in the modern landscape of constitutional litigation and call into question several landmark civil rights cases. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 12:38 pm
Today, Rule 26(a)(1)(A)(i) operates in parallel to this old patent rule, but for all civil actions. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 11:15 am
The ruling was based on evidence that the Chinese government’s forced birth control and sterilization policies targeting Uyghurs in the far western Xinjiang province were “intended to destroy a significant part” of the group’s population. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:02 am
In doing so, the court cites to a prior ruling in the JB case, before the JB court reconsidered the matter and reversed its position. [read post]
