Search for: "MATTER OF T L S" Results 5961 - 5980 of 9,101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2012, 9:36 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, April 30, 2007, the United States Supreme Court issued its final decision in the matter of KSR v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 10:36 am by Rick E. Rayl
  And I certainly don't know whether it matters whether I represent an agency or a landowner/business owner in this respect. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:48 pm by We Don't Judge - We Defend
  Your constitutional rights are solid and they say that you don’t need to talk to the police. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
” This is, more or less, the same point that Pennsylvania lawyer Christopher L. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:55 pm
Unless and until it does, it is not a genuine ECUSA diocese, no matter how many official pronouncements issue from no matter what quarter of the Church. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:48 pm
  It's a matter of taste, I know, but I don't really like using the term "cert" in an opinion. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:06 pm by Mandelman
  And don’t laugh… that’s pretty much what they thought… and still think for that matter. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s not that patentable subject matter has expanded, it’s encroachment into patent’s area. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
The division held that the subject-matter of claim 1 differed from the device of I2 […] in that it included the (additional and final) feature dealing with the relationship between the light output L and the signal level V. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:07 am by Steve Graham
Would you be interested in serving on the L&J committee? [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am by Steve Vladeck
  Rather, these precedents demonstrate conclusively that conspiracy historically has been triable by pure law-of-war military commission, a distinct piece of subject-matter jurisdictional analysis. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
(nearly identically) the wording of claim 2 according to the main request (without the reference to claim l), together with parts of the description pertaining to that claim 2. [read post]