Search for: "MAY v. US "
Results 5961 - 5980
of 120,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2024, 2:34 pm
This was the case in SnapRays, d/b/a SnapPower v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:42 am
I thought it would be useful to unpack the latest goings on. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 8:42 pm
Party Ltd. v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 3:54 pm
The Law Offices of James V. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 3:02 pm
Techs., Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
When browsing Case C‑97/12 P, Louis Vuitton Malletier v OHIM, a 15 May ruling of Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on registrability of an illustration of a lock for goods which either did or didn't have locks, he noticed that some of the cases cited in the CJEU's judgment had odd-looking citations for reference purposes. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 6:58 pm
Occidental, and Sarei v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
I have now got hold of the judgment in X v Hounslow [2008] All ER 337 (May) (thanks to assorted helpful sprites). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
This fight may be over, but the battle continues until every content owner embraces best practices that protect fair use." [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Wygant v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 2:12 pm
With us. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 9:02 am
The Ford opinion makes it clear that this is not how 18.21 is to be read.Which means that Texans need to know that cell phone company records may be reviewed by the police without them knowing anything about it — and what is found there may be used against them in a criminal proceeding.- See more at: http://www.dallasjustice.com/texas-police-can-get-your-phone-records-from-phone-company-without-a-warrant-ford-v-state/#sthash.p5P2TsIm.dpuf [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:31 pm
The tender documents required a tender deposit to be submitted with the bids, and included the following statement: . . . the tenderer guarantees that if his tender is withdrawn before the Commission shall have considered the tenders or before or after he has been notified that his tender has been recommended to the Commission for acceptance . . . the Commission may retain the tender deposit for the use of the Commission and may accept any tender, advertise for new… [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am
The case before the Supreme Court that will hopefully decide the matter is Cyan v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 10:34 am
The case before the Supreme Court that will hopefully decide the matter is Cyan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 7:24 am
Jody May Walters and her husband David guaranteed loans for David's homebuilding business. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 12:35 am
Cal. 2008) (Judge Whyte granting Rambus motion in limine to prohibit use of the term “patent troll” during the trial) Taurus IP v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:40 am
Brown v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 8:32 am
Moore v. [read post]
