Search for: "Mark Harms"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 10,422
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
This is not to say that the brand holder may not have suffered harm. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 2:06 pm
Patent and Trademark Office that declared the Redskins logo was “disparaging”, and in turn deem the marks to be in violation of federal trademark laws. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 11:24 am
Bexis is pretty pleased this morning. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:14 am
The first, obviously, is Judge Arnold’s inexplicable “no harm, no foul” perspective, because there can be nothing wrong with some peeping Tom looking into someone’s bathroom window if the person seen doesn’t know he’s there. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 11:50 am
While we've been critical of the Obama administration's approach to transparency on things like NSA surveillance, we strongly applauded this "presumption of openness," which stood in marked contrast to the approach of the Bush administration. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 10:24 am
Should they decide it was the 7th Circuit, it will mark a major change in employment law across the country. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 7:25 am
” Id. at 368 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
Argument “A plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction must establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, that he is likely to suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, that the balance of equities tips in his favor, and that an injunction is in the public interest. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 6:11 pm
The use of "sensibly" in Judge Hacon's judgements is itself becoming something of a trade mark. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 12:49 pm
Senate Democrats have blocked two earlier requests for the exemption, and while the White House has suggested that the move would not “alter…practices” but would only cut through red tape, Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) has called the request “short-sighted, irresponsible, and harmful to our interests. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
. which has many possible harmful side effects. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
Instead they claim it is “Labour’s Human Rights Act” which has overstepped the mark, allowing judges to invoke human rights law in issues where they should not be. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am
Instead they claim it is “Labour’s Human Rights Act” which has overstepped the mark, allowing judges to invoke human rights law in issues where they should not be. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014) Since 2010, I have been posting on the development of a new course I have been developing for our first year law school students, "Elements of Law. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:10 pm
His behavior has been the same each time and he has not harmed any residents as of yet. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
How serious are these harms/how inefficient? [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
” Golonka, 65 P.3d at 971-72 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
Oct. 27, 2014)Paz sued AG, alleging that its “The Protégé” brand jeans were misleadingly marked with a “Made in the U.S.A. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
The Court credit its denial in part on the findings of a court-appointed family advocate that Mark had physically abused A.H.S. and found that returning the children to North Carolina would expose them to a serious risk of harm, one of the Article 13 defenses. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:00 am
This piece originally ran at TomDispatch.com. [read post]
