Search for: "Mark I. Congress"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 7,022
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm
I think I have mentioned before the danger of "redacting" PDF files by just drawing black boxes over the words you want to keep secret. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
They were both off the mark a little bit here. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
The last time I looked, 38% was less than 120%. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:19 am
And more often than not, Congress is the primary cause for bewilderment as so aptly reflected by this article excerpt: Soon he was marking hearing dates on his calendar: "BEATING ON THE HILL. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 7:41 pm
" Perhaps I'm missing the point, but this distinctly sounds like the threat of a unilateral declaration of war against Pakistan, "unilateral" because there is, of course, not the slightest hint that the Administration will go to Congress for a declaration of war against our putative ally, Pakistan. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Cason declared Tuesday, “I am not a criminal. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The DOW wouldn't cross the 1,000 mark again until late in 1982. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
I’m not sure why this couldn’t have been done here, especially given the result on the state law claims.) [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
By adopting a common-law type multifactor test, I would argue, Congress accepted the history of trademark multifactor tests, which do typically weigh certain factors more heavily than others, both formally and, as Barton Beebe has shown, empirically.) [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 8:36 am
Eoannou, Mark J. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 7:20 pm
” Post-Goldstein, Congress enacted §301, and the legislative history is clear that Congress intended to preempt state law protection for post-1972 sound recordings. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 10:12 am
I am going to catch up on a number of items I have meant to blog on this week, all in one fell swoop. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 11:55 pm
Testimony before Congress should be accurate when you talk about something,†Franken said. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 4:31 pm
I do not normally do this, but since its launch in late September Brian Galbraith's Ontario Family Law Blog has been phenomenal. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:06 pm
What do I do if they occur? [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
 Arguing on behalf of respondent Karen Wilson, Mark T. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 3:03 pm
I cannot forecast to you the action of Russia. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 1:26 pm
The National Academy of Sciences — advisers to Congress and the president — reported that conclusions about bullet matching are opinion, not fact. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 11:48 am
In conclusion, any health care bill that comes out of congress that does not address these issues of patient safety is as worthless as the politicians who pass it. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 5:09 am
The great unknown of Congress. [read post]
