Search for: "Sellers v. Sellers"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 6,090
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2007, 1:07 am
New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal BRONX COUNTYReal Property Buyer Did Not Breach Contract to Purchase Property From Seller, Entitled to Return of Down Payment Rivera v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 1:56 pm
Lockyer v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
(the seller) and partially granted 328 Owners Corp. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 6:02 am
Earlier, in Pfizer v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 7:27 am
(a) Section 112 Licenses- Section 112(e)(4) of title 17, United States Code, is amended in the third sentence by striking `fees that would have been negotiated in the marketplace between a willing buyer and a willing seller’ and inserting `the fair market value of the rights licensed under this subsection’. [read post]
21 Apr 2007, 11:00 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:00 am
[10] Waits v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Although there are limitations on a patent owner's ability to collect royalties beyond a patent's statutory term, see Brulotte v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 9:31 am
Although there are limitations on a patent owner's ability to collect royalties beyond a patent's statutory term, see Brulotte v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 5:46 am
Phason v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:24 am
Assumable mortgage: a mortgage that can be transferred from a seller to a buyer; once the loan is assumed by the buyer the seller is no longer responsible for repaying it; there may be a fee and/or a credit package involved in the transfer of an assumable mortgage. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 2:20 am
Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Veys v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 6:00 pm
Judge Lasnik presumably will enter it in short order.The case is Topline Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 1:40 pm
Garcia-Padilla v. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:55 am
A buyer entered into an offer to purchase lake front property from a seller with a condition that the lot perk for a three bedroom house. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:15 am
It was in some ways reminiscent of cases like Hanson Trust PLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 3:18 pm
Coosemans Specialties, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:49 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:35 pm
Jensen Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 5:18 pm
No. 1 of Snohomish County v. [read post]
