Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 7,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 6:54 pm
Some people are leaving employers and treating their departure as an invitation to cash out small balances. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 6:59 am
Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond ruled in January in the case U.S. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 3:21 am
You give any randomly chosen man (or woman) a uniform and a badge and a gun and some authority and there's a chance it will be misused.But that same uniform, badge, gun, and authority - even after some psych screening (perhaps by people with no more psychological insight than I have) - lead some (and not a small percentage) to believe that they are due deference. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am
A small difference, noted by Peers, is that unlike the Advocate General, the Court merely refers to marriages concluded in another Member State. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 1:01 am
Tarbell’s father was a small oil producer who ultimately “sold out” to Rockefeller. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 11:33 am
Proactive disclosure prevents people from feeling misled by the artwork. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court decided Gideon v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:45 am
However, five of the top ten states here voted for Biden in 2020, albeit three of them (Arizona, Michigan, and Georgia) by very small margins. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 8:06 am
You can read a free sample chapter, Chapter 13 (Featuring People in Ads). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
The choices have always been bad and worse, with the distinctions usually being too small for the human eye to see. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:34 am
• The 25th Anniversary of McCleskey v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 5:01 am
The classic “commuting expenses are not deductible” axiom meets the case of the “Commuting Cops” and one of my favorite cases that I have my students read, Margaret Green v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 5:17 pm
Some non-binary and trans people can’t leave the house unless they’re wearing a binder. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 5:28 am
Lots of people are interested in this issue right now. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
Socialist Eugene V. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Meanwhile, the IPKat's friend, dynamic small London-based practitioner Shireen Smith (Azrights) is offering an employment opportunity. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 1:22 pm
In many cases, they may also qualify as a taking requiring compensation under the Supreme Court's 2021 ruling in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
