Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 5961 - 5980
of 13,583
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
State agencies, including those in Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have all reported to the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
C 07-6076 SI, 2008 WL 2951281, at *4-6 (N.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 12:11 pm
C 07-6076 SI, 2008 WL 2951281, at *4-6 (N.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
Cypress Income Fund V 8.25% Note Cypress Income Fund 8 8.25% Note Cypress Income Fund 11 Cole Credit Property Trust II, Ltd. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:07 am
Pierre Boussaroque & David Lemétayer, L’immunité souveraine de l’État : la pratique française Martin Ney, Sovereign Immunities of States: a German Perspective Wladyslaw Czaplinski, Current Polish Practice in the Domain of State Immunity Thomas Giegerich, The Holy See, a Former Somalian Prime Minister, and a Confiscated Pissarro Painting: Recent US Case Law on Foreign Sovereign Immunity Mathias Audit, La renonciation par un État… [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
In the case of Kerin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:35 pm
Pardus upheld a prisoner's complaint about improper denial of access to medication for hepatitis C. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:04 am
See State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:45 am
" Read the decision at: East Durham Wind, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am
Moreover, as used in Delaware law, the term “misappropriation” often implies dishonest or wrongful intent, or breach of duty (see e.g. 6 Del C § 2001 [1], [2] [misappropriation of trade secrets]; In re Vanderslice, 55 A3d 322, 326 [Del 2012] [attorney committed theft by "misappropriating" client funds]; Lingo v Lingo, 3 A3d 241, 242, 244 [Del 2010] [attorney-in-fact committed a "breach of trust" by misappropriating funds]). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
Naomi R. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 3:22 pm
Oliver edited by Jim Phillips, R. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 12:30 pm
Bd., No. 2014-C-0329 (La. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:48 am
Abbe R. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:47 am
On June 7, 2013, Eloisa C. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:23 pm
Jakimaviciute, R (On the Application Of) v Hammersmith And Fulham London Borough Council [2014] EWCA Civ 1438 Eligibility for allocation list, reasonable preference and homelessness. [read post]
