Search for: "State v. Character"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 7,506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
Speaking of freedom, John Green, father of slain 9-year old Christina Green, has this exceptional quote, via Popehat who recognizes the strength of character of Mr. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:10 am
Ramadas Shenoy v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 2:16 pm
He’s saying he didn’t want to be President of the United States so he could stay home and be “Daddy”? [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 2:21 pm
See, Nast v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:36 am
The seminal case dealing with application of the actual use doctrine to exempt entities is the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Dade County Taxing Authorities v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:36 am
The seminal case dealing with application of the actual use doctrine to exempt entities is the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Dade County Taxing Authorities v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
If the state can limit taxes in the name of private freedom, then why can the state not also limit zoning as well? [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 1:41 pm
I reflected on this while reading a virtually fresh-off-the-press copy of a judgment rendered by the (IP)-influential United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth District in the case of UMG Recordings, Inc. v Troy Augusto, No. 08-55998 (January 4, 2011) here. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 11:49 am
This latter particular reason for anonymity irks Fish, who argues that Justice Stevens went astray in his majority opinion in McIntyre v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 7:28 pm
In People v Dreyden, 15 NY3d 100, the New York State Court of Appeals addressed this issue. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:27 pm
Lucas v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 11:27 am
Lucas v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:00 pm
’” (State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:01 am
Citing the US Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 3:16 pm
See Uniloc USA, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:18 am
” (State v. [read post]