Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 11,968
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2013, 9:35 am
This is an unusual qui tam action, United States of America, Fair Laboratory Practices Associates v. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
Mid State Fire Equip. of Cent. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 10:36 pm
You can read a more complete description of the requirements for class certification in our article on the class action antitrust case of Comcast v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:20 am
The base is 25 percent of the retail price. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 10:30 am
The base is 25 percent of the retail price. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 9:52 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:34 pm
Tongli China paid 10% of the price. 60% of the price was paid by FEHL. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 4:25 pm
We have had 460,000 page views this year, more than half from the UK with the United States, India, Australia and Ireland making up the rest of the top five. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
The legal system of the United States has its roots in the laws of England. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:47 pm
Turning to free speech issues, the Court struck down state laws that banned ads featuring the price of beer and other alcoholic beverages in 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 12:25 pm
Recently, a series of federal court decisions in the case of Adams v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:24 am
Case C 379/14 TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV v Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd; Bacardi & Company Ltd, Bacardi International Ltd v TOP Logistics BV, Van Caem International BV might have been one such case in the eyes of its parties and participants, though this Kat isn't so sure. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 7:30 am
(Gurfein v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
The loss of the Chinese market for that period caused prices to decrease in the United States, which in turn caused harm to plaintiffs. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:00 am
Only in one instance have the Plaintiffs possibly stated a colorable claim. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
United States, 12-223, and Pleau v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 11:33 am
Supreme Court famously proclaimed American antitrust law to be a “consumer welfare prescription” in Reiter v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 1:57 pm
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
