Search for: "State v. So " Results 5961 - 5980 of 116,390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2023, 4:14 am by ernst
In so doing, it provides crucial context for understanding the history of the Equal Protection Clause and the continued struggles for immigrant rights today. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The rationale behind the practice directions is stated by the courts with nearly identical phrasing. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
The policy may say what state law applies—assuming state law allows the policy to do so. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Dhenne Avocats)
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:35 pm by Matthew Campbell
Accordingly, the Crow Tribe sought relief from the Repsis judgments pursuant to Rule 60(b), so that the State could not continue to use Repsis. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
To that end, this Essay analyzes an undisturbed line of Supreme Court cases from 1980-1990 – United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 8:25 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
One easy fix is to advance the dates for filing in the State Department’s Visa Bulletin so that many more backlogged beneficiaries of approved petitions can file I-485 adjustment of status applications and get ameliorative relief such as an employment authorization document (EAD), travel permission and to be able to exercise job portability under INA §204(j). [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 5:27 am by Will Baude
So why did the drafters omit the Notwithstanding Clause? [read post]