Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 5961 - 5980
of 11,370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2014, 4:19 pm
Both the state trial court and the state intermediate appellate court held that the suit was barred because Congress had repealed the private right of action under TISA, but the California Supreme Court reversed, holding that Congress had not barred state-law suits based on a violation of TISA. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 5:43 am
Someone along the line has had it, and says "this is enough," and the brakes are applied.With SB 899 the applicant bar said "enough" to the indemnity reductions. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 4:38 am
”Did plaintiffs state a valid claim? [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:58 am
This past week, the United States District Court of Eastern District of New York denied Duck Walk’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 9:28 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of the Program. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 10:41 am
The District Court agreed and granted MGM’s motion, stating “[i]f any part of the alleged wrongful conduct occurred outside of the limitations period, courts presume that the plaintiff ’s claims are barred by laches. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court reversed this decision in 2012, holding that the political question doctrine does not bar review of this case. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm
Perry, the Court refused to allow the sponsors of a state ban in California (“Proposition 8″) to pursue an appeal in place of state officials, who had declined to do so. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
At issue were motions to remand 53 multi-plaintiff cases originally filed in state court in California. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Although, to date, numerous Delaware stock corporations (and some corporations in Illinois, California, Maryland and several other jurisdiction) have adopted Chevron-type exclusive forum bylaws, there still remain certain issues regarding consent, personal jurisdiction and other mechanics. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:47 pm
In the case at bar, the defendant has not accepted responsibility and still maintains his innocence by way of his Alford-Serrano plea. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
California, 38 Cal. 2d 718 (1952).However, six years earlier, even the California Supreme Court was not as generous. [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:42 am
J & J Sports states that it is licensed as a distributor of the "Ruiz/Hamer" broadcast. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:03 pm
The case at bar involves a petition to modify a support obligation initially set by a New York State court and subsequently enforced by the Family Court in a USDL proceeding. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 pm
The Court, however, found that whatever anomaly might exist, it was consistent with IGRA’s history and design.[15] IGRA was enacted, the Court noted, after the Court’s decision in California v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 6:35 am
Tweet Tags: attorneys general, California, Colorado, constitutional law, Florida, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Mikal Watts, politics, Sheldon Silver, State Farm, state high courts, Tenth CircuitPolitics roundup is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
California, 13-8618; Galloway v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 10:00 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the State on all counts. [read post]
22 May 2014, 11:00 am
And we worked with offices across the FBI – from California, to Oregon, to Oklahoma, and back here in D.C. [read post]
22 May 2014, 10:07 am
The doctrine of laches cannot be invoked as a bar to a plaintiff’s claim for damages brought within the Copyright Act’s three-year statute of limitations period, according to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Petrella v. [read post]
