Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 5961 - 5980 of 7,437
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2018, 4:39 am by Edith Roberts
At the Penn Journal on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Sarah Paoletti maintains that “[d]ue to th[is term’s] ruling [in Jennings v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:48 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Friedman, Quazzo v Quazzo, 2020 NY Slip Op 32342(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 17, 2020], highlights some of the reasons few business divorce cases wind up before juries. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 5:00 am by J Robert Brown Jr.
  As they noted: Montana’s experience, and experience elsewhere since this Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:16 pm by Bonnie Shucha
The case involves a challenge to the NCAA’s regulations that restrict the amount of financial aid that colleges may provide to athletes. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 1:35 am by gmlevine
“Knowledge of Complainant’s rights is an essential part of the bad faith analysis,” Russell Frey d/b/a edHelper v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:34 am by Doyle Hodges
” In her book, “On Obedience,” philosopher Pauline Shanks-Kaurin qualifies this somewhat: “[U]nreflective obedience is not a virtue and may in fact be a vice and counterproductive to the military function. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 3:46 am by Peter Mahler
 Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 4, 2018]. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Bush’s use of military commissions to try suspected members of al-Qaeda in Hamdan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:43 am by Administrator
L’appelant a été reconnu coupable d’avoir conduit un véhicule en faisant usage d’un appareil tenu en main muni d’une fonction téléphonique, en violation de l’article 439.1 du Code de la sécurité routière. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:27 am by Jonathan H. Adler
  In her article, “Confirmation Messes, Old and New,” 62 U. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am by Josh H. Escovedo
But until the case law becomes clearer, this may be a risk unworthy of your client’s resources since it may result in a dismissal of your client’s claim after costly motion practice that puts you right back where you started. [read post]