Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 5961 - 5980 of 14,194
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2016, 2:59 am by Ben
But there's a new Copyright Act in the United States, just two years old, and it will allow you to reclaim your copyright from the publishers after 35 years. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:00 am
But there's a new Copyright Act in the United States, just two years old, and it will allow you to reclaim your copyright from the publishers after 35 years. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 10:00 pm by Coral Beach
Written public comments are recommended and may be submitted at the public hearings or to the Sanitation Branch at 99-945 Halawa Valley St., Aiea, Hawaii 96701 The deadline to submit comments is prior to the close of business on Dec. 16. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:50 am
Is there anyone here personally or has had a close relative or a very close friend involved in a situation that sounds similar in any way to this case, whether or not it resulted in a lawsuit or not? [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 11:25 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
OPM Plum Book: Every four years, just after the Presidential election, the “United States Government Policy and Supporting Positions” is published. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 8:19 am by John Elwood
United States silly-case-name award. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:38 am by Matt Tait
It didn’t take long after Trump’s unexpected election as the 45th president of the United States for the encryption debate to reemerge. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:59 pm by Will Baude
In addition to the Title VII sexual orientation case I just posted about, the Seventh Circuit will also hear en banc arguments tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 12:56 pm by Zachary Burdette, Quinta Jurecic
The United States formally confirmed that it made a “mistake” in accidently striking Syrian regime forces instead of Islamic State fighters on September 17th, the BBC tells us. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
There may be some exceptions to this, however, in areas like pre-emption or the dormant commerce clause, where the court is sometimes closely divided, but not always along traditional ideological lines. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:53 am
On December 6, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued a dramatic and historic ruling in the high-profile insider trading case of United States of America v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 8:01 am by Dan Harris
Many state owned enterprises do not see other SOEs or even the Chinese government itself as separate competitors. [read post]