Search for: "United States v. John" Results 5961 - 5980 of 11,599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 1:00 pm by Tim Edgar
United States, the Supreme Court interpreted a law passed in the wake of the collapse of Enron as result of massive white collar fraud. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:59 am
. - The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a royalty award in Gaylord v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:37 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
” That is what Edie Windsor imagined her late spouse, Thea Spyer, would have said after their love story brought down the core of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:48 am by Amy Howe
United States, reversing a fisherman’s conviction under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized grouper, garnered significant coverage and commentary. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:25 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in the main opinion that the 2002 law was so broadly worded that it “covers the waterfront, including fish from the sea. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 7:23 am by Richard M. Re
United States, Assistant to the Solicitor General Ann O’Connell drew that straw. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:54 am by rhapsodyinbooks
On this day in history, US Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:12 am by Brian Shiffrin
This right "'must be scrupulously protected'"(People v Smith , 87 NY2d 715, 721 [1996], quoting People v Corrigan , 80 NY2d 326, 332 [1992]). [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am by Guest Blogger
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 8:27 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Helferich sold a license to its patents “to what, at least at one time constituted most – we may assume all – of the manufacturers of mobile handsets for sale in the United States,” according to the Federal Circuit. [read post]