Search for: "Weeks v. Weeks" Results 5961 - 5980 of 67,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2016, 10:22 am by Adam Steinman
It’s a “nonprecedential disposition,” but the Seventh Circuit’s decision last week in Couvillion v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:58 am by immigrationprof
From Huffington Post: Last week marked the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 8:38 am by firstamendmentblogger
Deana Pollard-Sacks (Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law), Snyder v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 10:55 am by Steve Clowney
Last week the Supreme Court issued an opinion in Reed v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:53 am by buslawblogger
The Iowa Supreme Court last week issued an opinion in Frontier Leasing Corporation v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 8:42 am
Delaware Chancery Court Addresses Cancellation Value of Stock Options in Mergers A few weeks ago - in Lillis v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:22 pm by joanheminway
With my bum shoulder and a lot of work on our dean search cramping my style over the past few weeks, I have been remiss in posting about the 2021 Business Law Prof Blog Symposium, Connecting the Threads V. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:36 am
Supreme Court will hear argument next week in Federal Express Corp. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 7:48 am by Workplace Prof
Last week (yeah, I'm still catching up), the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:18 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Orin Kerr has this post at The Volokh Conspiracy, previewing oral argument from a case earlier this week: [T]he en banc Eleventh Circuit will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 7:09 am by Immigration Prof
Photo courtesy of the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office This week, ImmigrationProf has been offering daily coverage of the contempt hearings against Sheriff Joe Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office (MSCO) in Melendres v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 9:29 pm
This happened in our own Supreme Court a couple of weeks ago, in Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKHL 42: the “pre-nuptial agreement” case. [...] [read post]