Search for: ""Apprendi v. New Jersey" OR "530 U.S. 466""
Results 41 - 60
of 101
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 8:22 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), during sentencing because the jury made no finding of fact as to whether the substances involved in the case were Schedule II, III or IV substances? [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:30 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)), 2011 U. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) require “any fact” other than a prior conviction “that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury and proved beyond a reasonable doubt The government argued that the First Circuit properly interpreted the Supreme Court's warning “against expanding the Apprendi doctrine far beyond its necessary boundaries. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:28 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000),... [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and its progeny, apply to the imposition of criminal fines.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (1st Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 4:24 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:13 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is applicable where the consecutive sentence Appellant received is beyond the statutory maximum, and was not presented to the jury for the enhancement of the sentence. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:21 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Ring v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:14 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 489 (2000). [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) which was based on providing the defendant a right to a jury trial as guaranteed by the common law. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:48 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), where a judge, and not a jury, determined the facts as to the number of days of violation under a schedule of fines. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:42 pm
New Jersey (2000) 530 U.S. 466 that a defendant has the right to a jury trial on any facts—other than a prior conviction—that increase the penalty for a conviction beyond the statutory maximum. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 1:37 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). [read post]
15 May 2010, 10:42 pm
In a case called, Apprendi v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), the forerunner of the Court's landmark decisions in Blakely v. [read post]
