Search for: ""Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" OR "485 U.S. 224"" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 241-47 (1988), relying in part on the “fraud-on-the-market” (“FOTM”) theory. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:04 pm by Barry Barnett
The Supreme Court ruled in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 5:18 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 239 n.17 (1988), and an omission is actionable under the securities laws only when the Defendant was subject to a duty to disclose. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:43 am by William McGrath
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 248 n. 27 (1988), where it said: "[t]he Court of Appeals held that in order to invoke the presumption, a plaintiff must allege and prove … that the misrepresentations were material … . [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Morgan Stanley split from the Ninth Circuit, finding that a violation of Item 303 would be actionable under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 if plaintiffs met the materiality requirements set forth in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 In re Washington Mutual, Inc., No. 08-12229 (MFW), 2011 WL40907 [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 7:41 am by Kara OBrien
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), the Court held that “the materiality of adverse event reports is a ‘fact-specific’ inquiry that requires consideration of the source, content, and context of the reports. [read post]