Search for: ""Basic, Inc. v. Levinson" OR "485 U.S. 224"" Results 41 - 60 of 86
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
SCOTUS Cert. Grant of Interest: Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund
15 Nov 2013, 2:27 pm by Adam Steinman
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224... [read post]
Civil Procedure & Federal Courts Blog - http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/civpro/
Fifth Circuit Holds That Securities Fraud Defendants May Not Rebut the Fraud-on-the-Market Presumption at the Class Certification Stage Through Evidence of No Price Impact
21 Jun 2013, 11:26 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 241-42 (1988). [read post]
Corporate Securities Law Blog - http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/
United States Supreme Court Holds that Class Action Securities Fraud Plaintiffs Need Not Prove the Materiality of the Alleged False Statements or Omissions to Support Certification of a Class, Resolving Circuit Split
7 Mar 2013, 9:45 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), at the class certification stage of the proceedings. [read post]
Corporate Securities Law Blog - http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/
Materiality and Class Certification in Fraud-on-the-Market Cases
7 Mar 2013, 7:17 am by Brad S. Karp, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP,
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), which established the fundamental structure enabling claims under the federal securities laws to be litigated as class actions. [read post]
The Harvard Law School Corporate Governance Blog - http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Amgen Class
27 Feb 2013, 9:53 am by Barry Barnett
In Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
Blawgletter - http://blawgletter.typepad.com/bbarnett/
Guest Post: Oral Argument in Amgen -- Will it Sway the Court?
11 Nov 2012, 11:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 241-47 (1988), relying in part on the “fraud-on-the-market” (“FOTM”) theory. [read post]
The D & O Diary - http://www.dandodiary.com/
Which changes in accounting principle are material?
24 Oct 2012, 11:49 am by Kurt Schulzke
See also Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
The Schulzke Brief - http://schulzkelaw.com
Supreme Court To Address Standards For Class Certification in Securities Fraud Actions and Whether Plaintiffs Need to Prove “Fraud On The Market” Claim to Certify a Class-Action
1 Oct 2012, 10:29 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), has been a key tool for plaintiffs in class action securities fraud litigation under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5. [read post]
Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - http://www.chicagobusinesslitigationlawyerblog.com/
Former SEC Commissioners Urge Supreme Court to Hold Materiality Must Be Shown at Class Certification Stage in Private Securities Fraud Action.
23 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm by James Hamilton
Amgen, Inc. v. [read post]
Jim Hamilton's World of Securities Regulation - http://jimhamiltonblog.blogspot.com/
Should we use a Venn diagram when teaching materiality?
14 Jul 2012, 5:04 pm by Stefan Padfield
  See Basic Inc. v. [read post]
The Race to the Bottom - http://www.theracetothebottom.org/home/
Back to Basic: US Supreme Court to Hear Amgen and Clarify “Fraud-on-the-Market” Reliance Presumption in Class Actions
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm by Elder C. Marques
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
Canadian Appeals Monitor - http://www.canadianappeals.com
Back to Basic: US Supreme Court to Hear Amgen and Clarify “Fraud-on-the-Market” Reliance Presumption in Class Actions
4 Jul 2012, 7:34 pm by Elder C. Marques
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
Canadian Appeals Monitor - http://www.canadianappeals.com
Looking Ahead To The Supreme Court’s 2013 Class Action Opinions
28 Jun 2012, 5:52 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
For the Defense - http://forthedefense.org/ftd.aspx
Looking Ahead To The Supreme Court’s 2013 Class Action Opinions
28 Jun 2012, 5:52 am
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988). [read post]
DRI Today - http://dritoday.org/Default.aspx
Supreme Court Grants Cert To Determine If Plaintiff Must Prove Materiality Before Certifying Class in Securities Fraud Class Action
12 Jun 2012, 10:43 am by William McGrath
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224, 248 n. 27 (1988), where it said: "[t]he Court of Appeals held that in order to invoke the presumption, a plaintiff must allege and prove … that the misrepresentations were material … . [read post]
Federal Securities Law Blog - http://www.fedseclaw.com/
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Securities Class Action Against CBS Due to Plaintiffs' Failure to Plead Scienter and Reliance
25 May 2012, 7:29 am
Under Basic Inc. v. [read post]
Corporate Securities Law Blog - http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/
Why Agency Fraud Is Like Fraud On The FDA
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988) (4 justice majority of 7-justice court). [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
WaMu Decision Reinforces Insider Trading Principles
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 In re Washington Mutual, Inc., No. 08-12229 (MFW), 2011 WL40907 [read post]
Securities Law Practice Center - http://seclawcenter.pli.edu
WaMu Decision Reinforces Insider Trading Principles
29 Sep 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
 In re Washington Mutual, Inc., No. 08-12229 (MFW), 2011 WL40907 [read post]
Securities Law Practice Center - http://seclawcenter.pli.edu
A Summary of the Supreme Court’s Active Year In Federal Securities Cases
20 Sep 2011, 7:41 am by Kara OBrien
Levinson, 485 U.S. 224 (1988), the Court held that “the materiality of adverse event reports is a ‘fact-specific’ inquiry that requires consideration of the source, content, and context of the reports. [read post]
Securities Law Practice Center - http://seclawcenter.pli.edu