Search for: ""Wyeth v. Levine" OR "555 U.S. 555""
Results 41 - 60
of 73
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2012, 6:24 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:31 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), applicable to brand-name drug products approved under an NDA. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), that the FDA would not have allowed a developmental delay warning at any time in 2003 that could conceivably have affected the pregnancy at issue in Rheinfrank:Preemption is warranted because there is clear evidence the FDA would not have approved a change to the Depakote label adding a developmental delay warning prior to [plaintiff’s] injury. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
555 U.S. at 571 (emphasis added). [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:00 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), preemption arguments are swimming upstream. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), which is probably the worst prescription drug decision of all time (at least as to preemption):Levine didn’t adopt any “general no-preemption rule. [read post]
21 May 2015, 1:09 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), a preemption case otherwise on all fours with the facts here. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008), and Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
In Bartlett v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), in that Congress could have included some limitation provision in the 70+ years that both statutes have been on the books. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 10:56 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), it appeared that to argue preemption successfully, a brand-name manufacturer must provide “clear evidence” that the FDA would have rejected the relevant label changes. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:13 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555, 565 (2009) (quoting [Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), the case we most love to hate. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), an implied preemption drug case, in opposition to “different from or in addition to” express preemption under the Medical Device Amendments. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:24 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009) – we took a look.Hmmmm.For a post-Levine decision, we actually don’t think the rulings are all that bad. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 10:36 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555, 565 (2009) (considering only the “narrower question” of “an adequate warning” claim; avoiding preemption of a “duty to contraindicate”); PLIVA v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009). [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 2:01 pm
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009)). [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Although Czimmer v. [read post]
