Search for: "*state of al v. Corps of Engineers"
Results 41 - 60
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2015, 5:28 am
See, Hawkes Co., Inc. et al v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 4:36 am
Descarga el documento: United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:49 am
Hydraulic Servocontrols Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Tire Engineering and Distribution, LLC et al. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:00 am
The case is Sierra Club, Inc., et al., v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:46 am
NGK Metals Corp., et al. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 3:29 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (Oil and Gas Pipelines - Tribal Consultation )Nguyen v. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
Tajonera et al v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
The panel affirmed the district court's summary judgment in favor of the United States Army Corps of Engineers in an action under the Clean Water Act and the National Environmental Policy Act challenging the Corps' issuance of a permit as part of a project to mine valuable mineral sands near Coos Bay, Oregon. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 7:18 am
The opinion is Berthelot et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]), the custodian engineer's generalized testimony that she would regularly test the door and determine that it was functioning safely and properly, by itself and without any expert analysis, failed to establish, prima facie, defendant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Lugo v Belmont Blvd. [read post]
15 May 2024, 10:00 am
Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012]), the custodian engineer's generalized testimony that she would regularly test the door and determine that it was functioning safely and properly, by itself and without any expert analysis, failed to establish, prima facie, defendant's entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Lugo v Belmont Blvd. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Army Corps of Engineers, et al., 803 F.3d 31 (D.C. [read post]
6 Feb 2008, 2:39 pm
Sanders, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm
Army Corps of Engineers. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 6:50 am
Dematic Corp et al – United States District Court – Western District of Pennsylvania – February 22nd, 2016), the Plaintiff (McKenzie) sued Defendants for negligence, design defect, and failure to warn, when she was injured while operating a trash conveyor, manufactured by the Dematic. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
United States Department of the Interior, et al. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
In the case of Dacus, et al v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 7:28 am
Florida Power Corp. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 2:12 pm
Yazzie et al. v. [read post]
