Search for: "*u. S. v. Mckinney"
Results 41 - 49
of 49
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 1:44 pm
McKinney, 509 U. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 1:14 pm
In Baze v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 8:57 am
McKinney, 509 U. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 5:54 am
McKinney, 509 U. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
The settlement in McKinney v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:55 pm
Basic taglines -- unlike the truly famous Just Do It and Don't Leave Home Without It taglines -- have not consistently enjoyed a meaningful scope of protection: For example, in a somewhat similar reverse confusion case, a 2002 opinion from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cohn v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:23 pm
Co., 9 NY3d 264, 267; Belt Painting Corp. v TIG Ins. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 7:35 am
Co. v Lumberman's Mut. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:57 pm
See also McKinney's Insurance Law § 3103 (a) (even if the policy or provision is "in violation of the requirements or prohibitions of this chapter it shall be enforceable as if it conformed with such requirements or prohibitions"); Trizzano v Allstate Ins. [read post]