Search for: ",In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. B. and T. B., Parents."
Results 41 - 60
of 83
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 10:33 am
Board of Education (1947), for example, we upheld against an Establishment Clause challenge a New Jersey law enabling a local school district to reimburse parents for the public transportation costs of sending their children to public and private schools, including parochial schools. [read post]
12 May 2017, 2:49 pm
(a)(b)(1); count 1), and resisted an officer (§ 148, subd. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 2:00 pm
b. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
Mother was charged with attempted homicide and endangering the welfare of the children. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
R. 5.636(d). [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 6:53 am
R. 5.636(d). [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
As in the criminal court, the Family Court has to ensure fairness for both parties (Article 6 European Convention on Human Rights, Overriding Objective Family Procedure Rules), but here also in the context of prioritising the welfare of any child involved (section 1 Children Act 1989). [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:03 pm
There was also disparate treatment of children of single carer parents. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
(b).) [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:29 am
The natural parents did not do so well and a child welfare agency in Northampton County sought to have L.A. declared dependent, meaning that the child was not having basic needs met by the biological parents. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 10:00 am
B.1 (a). [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
(b).) [read post]
23 May 2015, 9:00 pm
In his motion respondent relies on recent appellate authority, to wit Matter of Vitti, 202 A.D.2d 917, 609 N.Y.S.2d 686 (3rd Dept.1994) which holds that Family Court Act Article 8 does not authorize imposition of consecutive commitments. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:54 am
R. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:55 am
” The impossibility of perfect tailoring is especially apparent when the State’s compelling interest is as intangible as public confidence in the integrity of the judiciary. b. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:17 pm
And there will be much concern expressed about “the children,” both those of same-sex families and opposite-sex parents. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:37 pm
That would include lone parents with children under 6 months old, families with children in local schools (unless in year 11), or someone in employment in the borough. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
” B. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm
I don’t see how A (A Child) and Y(Children) can sit together. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
In Michael B. v. [read post]
