Search for: "-NMK Call v. Commissioner of Social Security" Results 41 - 60 of 474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
” This is precisely what the Supreme Court called for in TSC Industries v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:12 pm
The key to our true security lies in addressing social and economic problems by dealing with them as fundamental rights, and the sooner we can realize this the safer and more prosperous we will all be. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 6:03 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
If you or a loved one is seeking Social Security Disability Insurance in Boston, call for a free and confidential appointment at 1-888-367-2900. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The incentives aggravated by this funding plan make it even harder for real concerns about monetary, security, and privacy costs to be taken seriously.[3] The funding proposal we are considering today—the latest effort by the CAT LLC to fund past and future expenses—employs an apparently plausible approach to allocating CAT costs. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:56 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Hearing the calls for legislation and regulation, the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) adopted a Data Security Model Law with the goal of having it adopted in all states within a few years. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Lina M. Khan
The Commission brought its first internet privacy case 24 years ago against GeoCities, one of the most popular websites at the time.1 In the near quarter-century since, digital technologies and online services have rapidly evolved, with transformations in business models, technical capabilities, and social practices. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
The death of TV presenter Caroline Flack has led to widespread condemnation of press intrusion and renewed calls for regulation of the press and social media. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 2:55 pm by Michel-Adrien
It tried to do so in the context of Supreme Court of Canada judgments in R. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:49 am by Legal Beagle
I believe that this censorship was draconian given that details of own case, Stott v Minogue 2000 SLT (Sh Ct) 25, & GWD 36-1386, - which spawned the petition – and the decision by the Social Security Commissioner, Ref: CS1/136/02. are in part matters of public record, or have been reported widely in the press and legal journals and are the two most important Scottish cases that deal with the influence of freemasonry in the justice system. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am by Andres
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media On 1 July 2019 Wikipedia co-founder, Dr Larry Sanger, called for a 2 day boycott of social media. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Pursuant to the Retirement and Social Security Law, the salary base used to compute retirement benefits shall not include . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement" (Matter of Franks v DiNapoli, 53 AD3d 897, 898 [3d Dept 2008] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]; see Retirement and Social Security Law § 431 [3]; Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d 1208, 1209-1210 [3d Dept 2018]). [read post]