Search for: "A M v. Review Board" Results 41 - 60 of 2,587
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2011, 4:12 am
Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board determines if there is disqualifying misconduct for the purposes of receiving unemployment insurance benefitsMatter of Green v Village of Hempstead, 2011 NY Slip Op 00137, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe Village of Hempstead dismissed Deputy Village Attorney Donna M. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 1:58 am by Dennis Crouch
Guest post by Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Professor at the Texas A&M University School of Law and the Texas A&M College of Engineering. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 10:23 am by Ronald Mann
I’m not sure, I guess you can help me on how that also includes the authority whether to grant review of this or that claim, the weeding out process. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 11:54 am
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently affirmed the Board of Review's decision requiring claimant, Anthony M. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm by Guest Blogger
State Bar Director Christy Amuny of Beaumont and Granbury attorney Cindy V. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen I’m thrilled to announce the publication of the articles from the Iowa Law Review’s symposium, Administering Patent Law. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
To classify race, we rely on machine learning algorithms that use a combination of image processing and name prediction algorithms and conduct extensive manual review of the initial algorithmic classifications. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The other ... treats the rule not as a standard of review but as a doctrine of abstention, pursuant to which courts simply decline to review board decisions. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:30 am
VC Strine: Application of "Compelling Justification" Standard of Judicial Review From John Grossbauer: Last week, Vice Chancellor Strine of the Delaware Chancery Court - in Mercier v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm by Howard Knopf
Whether the Courts will agree may be another matter, which may get addressed in judicial review of this decision and perhaps much sooner in the AC v. [read post]