Search for: "A v. X, Y, and Z"
Results 41 - 60
of 298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
A state that had previously granted X based on Y then amends its laws to give the same X based not on the now-illegal Y, but rather on Z -- with the deliberate knowledge that all (or nearly) all Z's are Y and that all or nearly all Y's are Z. [read post]
22 Aug 2020, 7:37 am
Insights from A Local Authority v X, Y and Z Azizah Mohd & Nadhilah A. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:13 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Grand v Gill [2011] EWCA Civ 554 (19 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Sammon v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1199 (18 May 2011) Dobson, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1256 (18 May 2011) High Court (Family division) X, Y, Z (Minors), Re [2011] EWHC 1267 (Fam) (18 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Dobson, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1256 (18 May 2011) London Borough of Wandsworth v Covent… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 11:54 am
There, Arnt was charged with murder (X, the greater offense) as well as voluntary manslaughter (Y, the lesser offense) and, as here, the jury acquitted on X but convicted on Y. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:25 am
If the legislative authority says that offenses, X, Y, and Z are punishable by death and in the same enactment exempts offenses punishable by death from the statute of limitations, it has decided that offenses X, Y, and Z are exempt from the statute of limitations. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 4:05 pm
The point is this: if there's a statute that says that you're guilty if you do X in settings involving Y and Z, the state's required to prove each of X, Y and Z. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:44 am
Kobus IIII recently presented on the topic of Healthcare Data Breaches--A to Z at the annual American Society for Healthcare Risk Management (ASHRM) conference in Phoenix. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 10:14 am
Dollars (Photo credit: 401(K) 2013) Y is for Year-End Bonus. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:03 pm
Estatua de la Madre Patria, 1967, 91 m (excl. el zócalo) 4. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 4:06 pm
Implica reconocerlo y saberlo como tope -y viceversa-. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:45 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union Delivers Judgment in the Joined Cases of C-199/12, C-200/12 and C-201/12, X, Y and Z v Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel (European Database of Asylum Law, Nov. 2013) [text]- See also related AIDA update, Economist article, and Lettres article below." [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 3:59 pm
In X, Y, Z v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 2:39 pm
When the Supreme Court of Canada says “X” in 2007, and repeats “X” in 2011 adding explicitly that “X does not mean Y but means Z”, it is reasonable to assume (is it not?) [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 10:26 am
You can learn more about this from Justice Corrigan's opinion, but the easiest hypo is when you're trying to kill X and X is standing in a tight group of 10 people and you blast your Uzi into the group, killing not only X (who you wanted to kill) but also Y and Z. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 10:02 am
Y is for YouTube, which was ordered to remove a video posted by a disgruntled law firm client. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 4:30 am
Reaching the debt ceiling means that Congress has presented the President with three laws (or sets of laws) with which he cannot simultaneously comply: (1) Spend amount X. (2) Tax amount Y. (3) Borrow no more than Z, where X > Y + Z. [read post]
20 May 2021, 12:07 pm
Blumer,- X and Y were replaced by Mr. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 7:01 pm
David X. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
Z is the mother of X, and acted as a carer and advocate for both X and Y. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:18 am
If you do X, with Y harm, you get Z. [read post]
