Search for: "A. C. Davis" Results 41 - 60 of 3,176
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2024, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Louis University Law Journal (forthcoming 2024) (Childress Lecture Symposium)).Aziza Ahmed, Nicole Huberfeld & Linda C. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by renholding
I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Mellissa Duru, Luna Bloom, Elliot Staffin, Kristin Baldwin, Valian Afshar, Almaze Semere, Dennis Hermreck, Nolan McWilliams, Grace Baer, Lindsay McCord, Ethan Horowitz, Robert Errett, Deegi Biteng, Adam Turk, Ted Yu, Liz Walsh, Duc Dang, Brad Skinner, Mike Reedich, Kat Bagley, Cheryl Brown, Jeb Byrne, Nabeel Cheema, John Fieldsend, Jason Weidberg, Michael Coco, Angie Kim, Charli Gibbs-Tabler, and Chris… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by lawbod
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The first three were the “the use of financial inducements to generate referrals,”“schemes involving nursing homes,” and “protecting the Medicare Advantage Program, also known as Medicare Part C. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Title may seem surprising b/c Dogan advocated for TM use to distinguish b/t secondary and direct liability in TM law. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am by Mark Graber
  I have discovered only one relative minor legal treatise published before 1866 that dissents from this consensus.Constitutional lawyers when Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment was framed recognized that an insurrection involved a) an assemblage, b) resisting any federal law or interfering with the course of a federal proceeding, c) by force or intimidation, d) for a public purpose. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Apr. 28, 2020) ("[C]laims involving sexual orientation … are examples of matters that qualify as being highly sensitive and of a personal nature. [read post]