Search for: "A. C. Davis"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2024, 4:05 am
Louis University Law Journal (forthcoming 2024) (Childress Lecture Symposium)).Aziza Ahmed, Nicole Huberfeld & Linda C. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm
I’d like to thank members of the SEC staff for their work on these final rules, including: Mellissa Duru, Luna Bloom, Elliot Staffin, Kristin Baldwin, Valian Afshar, Almaze Semere, Dennis Hermreck, Nolan McWilliams, Grace Baer, Lindsay McCord, Ethan Horowitz, Robert Errett, Deegi Biteng, Adam Turk, Ted Yu, Liz Walsh, Duc Dang, Brad Skinner, Mike Reedich, Kat Bagley, Cheryl Brown, Jeb Byrne, Nabeel Cheema, John Fieldsend, Jason Weidberg, Michael Coco, Angie Kim, Charli Gibbs-Tabler, and Chris… [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:38 am
§ 1.6(c)(1). [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:11 am
Davis, Jr. and yours truly, John L. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:23 pm
C 12-0195 PJH, 2012 WL 12964819, at *3 (N.D. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 5:57 am
Jeffery-Poulter, p. 148 – 150. [4] Dudgeon v the United Kingdom App no 7525/76 (ECtHR, 22 October 1981). [5] United Nations’ Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. [6] CEDAW/C/OP.8/GBR/1 2018 – paras. 83 – 85. [7] [2018] UKSC 27. [8] The Abortion Act 1967: a biography of a UK law, S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
The first three were the “the use of financial inducements to generate referrals,”“schemes involving nursing homes,” and “protecting the Medicare Advantage Program, also known as Medicare Part C. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:41 am
Davies (Del. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Title may seem surprising b/c Dogan advocated for TM use to distinguish b/t secondary and direct liability in TM law. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
” 750 ILCS 5/609.2(c) That notice must be very specific. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
If A conspires with B who conspires with C, all are linked in one conspiracy—even if A does not even know that C exists (and vice versa) and even if their specific plans diverge in many details.[23] (This is why the Amar brief repeatedly speaks of, for example, "Floyd and other top officials" and "Floyd and his allies. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 4:56 am
Alys Davies reports for BBC News. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:19 pm
Davis, 139 S. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
I have discovered only one relative minor legal treatise published before 1866 that dissents from this consensus.Constitutional lawyers when Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment was framed recognized that an insurrection involved a) an assemblage, b) resisting any federal law or interfering with the course of a federal proceeding, c) by force or intimidation, d) for a public purpose. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Apr. 28, 2020) ("[C]laims involving sexual orientation … are examples of matters that qualify as being highly sensitive and of a personal nature. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 7:31 am
Introduction The Supreme Court heard argument last month in Moore v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
See Davis & Cox v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Davis and Jacob E. [read post]
