Search for: "A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE" Results 41 - 60 of 94
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2018, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
Philip Randolph Institute (argued 1/1/2018) The Justices are looking at an apparent conflict between federal voting statutes and state-based programs to maintain voter registration lists. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, Hall v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, “violated federal law. [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 4:16 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the Supreme Court will decide whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws, explaining “why the use of because of and by reason of doesn’t necessarily require but-for causation. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the Supreme Court will decide whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws, We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 12:02 pm by Howard Wasserman
A Philip Randolph Institute, on whether an Ohio process of removing voters from voting rolls based, in part, on failure to vote violated federal law. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:19 pm by Oyez Project
Philip Randolph Institute The post This week’s oral argument audio now available on Oyez appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the Supreme Court considered at oral argument this week whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws, noting that “the court challenge highlights the extent to which an individual voter’s ability to cast a ballot could depend on where he or she lives, an increasingly pressing concern as states take divergent approachesto establishing voter eligibility. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 2:30 pm
Philip Randolph Institute: Ohio's legal justification for its massive voter purge is complete gobbledygook. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the justices will decide whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 4:10 am by Lindsay Offutt
Philip Randolph Institute [docket], a case challenging Ohio's voter registration maintenance policy, which permits the government to remove individuals from the voter registration list after several years of absence at the polls. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 1:31 pm by NCC Staff
Philip Randolph Institute considers a conflict between federal voting statutes and state-based programs to maintain voter registration lists by removing inactive voters. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 10:45 am by Andrew Hamm
Philip Randolph Institute is available on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the justices will consider whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm
Philip Randolph Institute, the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, and Larry Harmon, an Ohio voter. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, in which the Supreme Court will consider this week whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws, is “one of an array of cases in which Trump administration appointees over the past year have flipped the Justice Department’s position, moves with potential ramifications on election law, labor practices, immigration and other issues. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Philip Randolph Institute, which will be argued next week and in which the Supreme Court will decide whether Ohio’s voter-roll-maintenance process violates federal voter-registration laws, reporting that “[t]he core of Husted involves a tricky detail of statutory interpretation” and that “[f]or decades, the Department of Justice (DOJ) understood the law the way the challengers do[, b]ut in a rare about-face the DOJ under Donald Trump now… [read post]